Comparison of the DAE results with the old CDR
Note : picture in this page were obtained with Analyse version 1.2. They have been checked to be identical to the ones got with analyse 1.4, exept for one or two pixels here and there. The Sony (1) and the Memorex are very alike : Note : this is an animated picture. Animations must be enabled in your browser in order to view it. They also have the same offset, rip at the same speed making the same noise. According to the rumour, they are both Lite-On clones. Upgrading the Teac firmware, which mostly allows a faster burst mode, lead to a result a little worse :
Recording the SPDIF output of the Memorex instead of ripping in burst mode was not a good idea : There was no benefit at all to use the audio chip and it's supposed better interpolation of read errors. In fact, we will see that it doesn't interpolate better than the audio extraction mode ! Here is the comparison between the others : In red, the Memorex, and very close to it, in pink,
the Yamaha 3200 burner. Above, this is the first extraction made with the Sony, that is compared. Here's a comparison between the first and the second one, made 14 days later : In green, the first one, in red, the second one. There
were more errors the second time. Maybe the CDR became a
little more worn during this time, I don't know. However,
I used the first one in the comparisons above, since it
was done the same day as the others.
Next : C2 results with the old CDR |